Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished?

Related Essays

  • Murders Must Pay Running head: Murders Must Pay Murders Must Pay Chase Waterstradt Introduction to Criminal Justice Section 001 Criminals on death row should be executed, because ...
  • Capital Punishment Capital punishment Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crime...
  • Capital Punishment Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with an intentional or criminal intent. In today's world, terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many be...
  • Death Penalty: Brutal Or Crucial? Death Penalty: Brutal Or Crucial? Death Penalty: Brutal or Crucial? By: Unknown Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with an intentional or crimi...
  • Death Penalty Singapore takes away a life, again. The life of young Van Tuong Ngyuen, who died at the end of a rope in Singapore for drug trafficking 25 times the amount of her...

Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished?

Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?
Society has always used punishment as a way to deter crime. Murder is what society has the biggest interest in preventing. The death penalty is the strongest punishment available to deter murder. The idea being that if there is the fear of losing one’s own life than a would-be murderer might think twice about taking someone else’s life. Edward Koch said, “It is by exacting the highest penalty for the taking of human life that we affirm the highest value of human life”. (Koch, 1985)
Imprisonment alone does not stop some who would murder. It is not a deterrent only an inconvenience. Criminal law is meant to protect victims or potential victims. Even the Bible advocates the death penalty. Leviticus 24:17 says, ‘If a man takes the life of any human being, he shall surely be put to death’. (New American Standard Bible) Ask any victim how they feel and the majority will say they are for the death penalty.
There are two lives to consider in a crime, the criminal and the victim. There is more “press” put on the criminal and the debate of the punishment that would fit the crime. Not enough “press” is given to the victims of the crime or to the victims families and the suffering or costs they are enduring. The victim of a murder does not get to live a full life; they do not get a second chance at anything. The criminal continues to live, and appeal the case against him/her.
What is the difference between going to war and killing in order to defend a countries right to live in peace without worry of slaughter and applying the death penalty to a murderer in order to give others the right to live in peace? Protecting the rights of a group of people is of the utmost importance. Capital punishment is not excessive or unnecessary when someone knowingly commits murder. True justice requires punishing the guilty. I take my stand for keeping the death penalty.
There are several arguments to defend the abolishment of the death penalty. The...

View Full Essay

  • Submitted by: jenzachjoel
  • Date Submitted: 03/09/2009 05:43 PM
  • Category: Philosophy
  • Words: 1443
  • Pages: 6
  • Views: 538
  • Popularity Rank: 2494

View Full Essay

Want More?

Thousands of students trust PeerPapers.com for help with their writing. Shouldn't you?

Join Now