Science
"There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."
In the contemporary society, observation can be driven by different goals according to the field itself we use this observation. It is injustice to say that all observations are subjective. To be subjective, it means it is guided by the personal desires and expectations, while the objective observation means the presence of logic and depends on unexpected results. Thus, observation is whether objective or subjective regarding to the aspect at which observer works.
First, objective observation is conspicuous in science. Along history, many discoveries prove that scientists' observations for their experiments were out of their prospective. Newton, for example, while he was taking a rest, he noticed an apple fallen down on his head. Through this incident, he defined gravity and put his theory. Moreover, astronomers came up with their knowledge about our universe through their objective observations into orbits. It is impossible to say that what information they got was expectant. Up to now, there are still mysterious inquiries about our universe which needs more investigation. In all fields of science, scientists use their objective observations depending on the seen results of the experiments. However, if their observations were subjective, the results of their experiments would be managed according to their personal desires and then what benefits would the whole world get, eventually?
Another reason can be cited for observations are not completely subjective is for critics. If a person is working as a critic, his judgment about any work should be a combination of subjective and objective. Consequently, he can give the best conclusion for one's work. However, using solely subjective observation is unfair as it may be a personal hostility between the critic and the publisher, for instance. Therefore, not only...
View Full Essay
