Civil Rights
Cvl Rghts Act 1964: cn’t discim. Based rce, rlign, sex, natnl orgn 1.pub. accmodtn ( restarnt/ htls 2. title VII busns lbor unon (15 or mre) 3. Ttle VI Any progm recevn fed mney 4. permts discrmtn is BFOQ/ enfrcmnt (EEOC)Votn Rght Act 1965: 1)No Literary/gd chrctr tst 2) Bilngal Matrials/ enfcd (US Dpt. Of just) Not all discrmtn is ilgal 1) Ratnal basis most use2)Strct Scrunty: discmtn on rce3) substnal relship: sex discim.
Fare Housn Act 1968- cnt discrim. in sle,rentl 1)Redlin: bnk Dnt loan $ 2 low incme areas2) steern: realor tak u 2 ur hse Rehb Act 1973 1) cnt discrim, agnst physly chlngd 2) comp. who hre physly handicpd look on fvrble by fed Ct Titl IX1) Stp sex disrim univ, recvn fed $2) Athltc prgrms must hve bth sexs Edu.for al hndicped kid 1975: Fre & =
Edu. Dept of edu. Afirmtve actn- step tkn pst disciminatn Pub Sctr 1978 Bake v univ. cal at davis: Med Schol set asde 16seats for blks 1)14th Amend. Equal protectn 2) title VI: prgrm recvn fed $ Decson: racal qotas r illgl rce mayb consdred 2 hve a divrsfd studnt bdy Prvt Sect: webr v Kasr alumum- webr pasd ovr for prmtion Bsed on Title VII Busnes/ labr unon Decde: 1) affirm. Actn is ok in prvt sect.2)volntry plan 3)didn’t dismis or exclde white 4)intnt of title VII wasn’t discrim. Stotts V mempis: FF want racial balnce SupCt: senorty sysem mst be hnred. Fullilve V. Klutznk: Set asde 4 minortes 10% 4 minrty contratrs SupCt say ok b/c of discim in pst KorematsuVus: Japs intrmnt Why did it 1) fear invsin on wst cst 2)loylty SupCt:1)Ratnal basis 4 discrm 2)natonal Securty survivrs 1988 $20000 survrs Lau v Nicols: Decisn Title VI fed fnd invlvd 1848- 1st wmn rght convntn 1900- 4 st. alowd wmn 2 vte 1920- 19th amend
ERA(eql Rgt Amnd) Cmmnty Invstmnt Act- bank cant buy anthr bank unlss1963 Equl Pay Act glas ceiling- wmn cnt adv.in corp wrld Quid Pro Quo (this 4 that)Emplyr is liable unless 1) took steps2 stop harassmnt2)victm didn’t take adv of avalble measrs Archtctual barrers Act – all pub buildings must...
View Full Essay
