Anthropology Vs Bibliology
This is a subject that I have pondered since this class began. It seems that there are always three sides to ever story as my Grandfather used to say. There is his, hers and the truth. It seems that most extreme Christians say their side is the truth and the science community says their side is the truth. I tend to explore that there can be a happy medium, between Christianity and Science, in other words, the plausible truth. I will answer the question which is correct the Christians, the Scientists or both.
It states in the Bible that God created Man in his/our image . In doing so he started a link to all humans of the world, so we are to understand. If the Bible is the truth then how is it possible that the Biblical records shows that there are only two off springs of Adam and Eve, where Cain and Abel . Cain then slaughters Abel so there is only one sibling left. When God confronts Cain about Abel’s death, Cain left for the land of Nod . Nowhere in the Biblical text does it mention how the rest of the land had been populated. If Adam and Eve are the mother and father of the world, then why is there no evidence of the other children? The Bible leaves to many questions left open, like did God create more than one set of Adam and Eve to help populate the world? Was incest common between Eve and her male children? How did the rest of the land become populated?
Per the evolutionist everything happened in a Big Bang Theory the world started about 10 to 20 billion years ago in one of the largest cosmic explosions known to man. With this the genetic soup as it where was all life on Earth started. If this is correct then there is no God that created the world or the universe. Most evolutionists are deep down bare knuckle scientist, and they have a hard time understanding any other theory of how the world was created.
There is no real anthropological evidence of Adam and Eve to date, but there is Genetic proof of an Adam and Eve. Scientists from...
View Full Essay
